Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tightly written, actionable, safety-first triage workflow with explicit validation and feedback loops throughout. Its only weak spot is progressive disclosure: the single bundled reference is real and appropriately separate but is not surfaced as a clearly signaled in-body link.
Suggestions
Add an explicit in-body pointer to the routing example file (e.g., 'See references/routing.example.md for the routing map format') so the reference is clearly signaled for navigation.
Consolidate the repeated preflight/root-message safety restatements into a single canonical rule that steps reference, to tighten conciseness.
Consider pulling the long marker-contract and create-criteria checklists into a short reference if the body grows, keeping the overview lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no concept over-explanation, assuming Claude's competence; a few safety rules are restated across sections (e.g., repeated preflight/root-message warnings), keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it provides highly concrete guidance — exact coordinate variables, an explicit marker contract with examples, specific dedupe search keys, and a numbered create-criteria checklist — which is fully actionable without code. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 10-step sequence includes explicit validation checkpoints (preflight the source parent, fail-closed 'stop with no writes', verify the verdict landed) and feedback loops (compensate if a created ticket's verdict failed). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into numbered sections and routes the routing example to a real separate file (references/routing.example.md), but that reference is signaled via the config path rather than a clear in-body navigable link, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |