Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered skill body: a sequenced workflow with named primitives, non-negotiable state coverage, gated AI-trust requirements, and clean one-level-deep references that all resolve to real files. The only deductions are minor phrasing redundancy and an implicit post-review feedback loop.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the Genie gate: the section states the all-five requirement twice ('implement ALL five' then 'ship all five') within consecutive sentences — keep one phrasing and drop the other to save tokens.
Make the workflow's feedback loop explicit: after the Review step, add 'if a checklist fails, revise the component plan and re-run the checklist' so the validate→fix→retry cycle is stated, not implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes domain knowledge, but has minor redundancy: the Genie section says 'implement ALL five' and then 'ship all five' in consecutive sentences, and the frontmatter's dashboard-boundary is re-stated at length in the body where the skill has already fired. Not score 3: padding is minor and most tokens earn their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully actionable: exact component and hook names (Skeleton, Empty, Badge, Card, Alert, useAnalyticsQuery/queryKey, useGenieChat, colorPalette), an exact API route and headers (/api/whoami, x-forwarded-email), a concrete config key (user_api_scopes: [dashboards.genie]), and a copy-ready output-format template. Exact snippets are delegated to a verified reference file as directed. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step Frame→Genre→Compose→Notation→Bind→States→Review sequence is clear and ends in a validation checkpoint ('run the checklists in both reference files'), but the recovery loop after a failed checklist — revising the component plan and re-checking — is implicit rather than an explicit fix-and-retry step. Not score 5 by the explicit-feedback-loop anchor; not score 3 since checkpoints and checklists are present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a true overview: all four cited paths (dashboard-patterns.md, ibcs-notation.md, appkit-cheatsheet.md, genie-ai-trust.md) exist in references/, are one level deep, and cross-reference only as siblings. The Genie section even gates loading its reference ('skip this section and references/genie-ai-trust.md entirely') — exemplary on-demand loading. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |