Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient instruction skill: a clear sequenced workflow, concrete component/token/API bindings, mandatory-state and AI-trust specs, and clean progressive disclosure into four real reference files. The only gap is the absence of an explicit gated validate/retry loop in the workflow, which is less critical for a non-destructive design skill.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'if a checklist item fails, fix and re-run the relevant checklist before finalizing' feedback loop to step 7 (Review) to push workflow_clarity to a clean 5.
Consider inlining one minimal end-to-end component-plan example (element → AppKit component + queryKey + token + states) in the body so a single common case is copy-paste ready without opening references.
Confirm the 'Compose' tradeoff step names which reference sub-section to consult for each pattern (data abstraction / meta-info / layout / interaction / color) to tighten navigation into dashboard-patterns.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instruction-dense — it assumes Claude's competence, never explains what a chart/KPI/IBCS is, and every section (workflow, states, AI surfaces, output template, anti-patterns) carries actionable content with no padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Names exact, real exports and APIs — '@databricks/appkit / @databricks/appkit-ui' exports, 'useAnalyticsQuery'/'queryKey'+'sql.*', 'colorPalette'+semantic tokens, 'Skeleton'/'Empty'/'Card'/'Badge'/'GenieChat', '/api/whoami', 'x-forwarded-email', 'user_api_scopes: [dashboards.genie]', 'attachments[].query', 'useGenieChat().status' — and provides a concrete output template; per the instruction-skill note, deferring copy-paste snippets to references is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence (Frame→Genre→Compose→Apply notation→Bind→Cover states→Review) ending with a checklist-driven review step, but it stops short of an explicit gated validate→fix→retry loop, so it sits just below the anchor that requires explicit error-recovery feedback. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview body points to four well-signaled one-level-deep reference files (dashboard-patterns, ibcs-notation, appkit-cheatsheet, genie-ai-trust), each tied to a specific role (composition/notation/implementation/AI-trust); all four files were verified to exist, with no nested-reference chaining. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |