Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview body with genuinely actionable commands and an exemplary validation checklist for Apps, supported by a clean one-level-deep reference set. Its main weaknesses are redundancy: the App naming rule is written twice in overlapping detail, one guideline is an unreadable run-on sentence, and version-dependent guidance is duplicated instead of isolated.
Suggestions
Merge General Guideline 7 into the Required App Completion Contract (or replace it with a one-line pointer) to eliminate the duplicated App-naming guidance.
Split Guideline 7's run-on sentence into short bullet points, e.g. one bullet per rule: default naming for CLI >= 0.270.0, production override, explicit value on older CLIs.
Consolidate the CLI 0.270.0 version-dependent behavior into a single 'Version-dependent behavior' or legacy subsection so time-sensitive version numbers appear once instead of twice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient pointers and commands, but the App naming rule is stated twice in near-identical detail (General Guideline 7 and the Required App Completion Contract bullets), Guideline 7 is a single 60+ word run-on sentence, and version numbers ("Databricks CLI 0.270.0 or later", appearing twice) are scattered rather than isolated in a versioned/legacy section, which the judging guidance explicitly penalizes. This fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' better than the minor-trim bar of 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: "bundle validate --strict --target <target>", "databricks bundle validate --strict --target <target> --output json", the ".databricks/bundle/<target>/variable-overrides.json" path, and concrete patterns like "name: ${var.app_name}" and "<name>.<resource_type>.yml". Minor gaps remain because full YAML examples are deferred to reference files rather than shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Required App Completion Contract sequences re-read → structural checklist → validate --output json → inspect names → persist overrides and re-validate, an explicit feedback loop, and Guideline 1 mandates validation after every change. A 5 would require the main create→configure→validate→deploy workflow itself to be explicitly sequenced in the body rather than implied through sections and the reference-file ordering. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with five one-line-described references that all exist as real files one level deep (verified: no nested .md references inside them), plus external docs. Minor organization gaps hold it below 5: Guideline 7 duplicates the App contract content inline, and the "When to Use This Skill" section largely repeats the frontmatter description. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |