Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced skill with strong validation and feedback loops, but it is dense and inlines several topics that would read better as one-level-deep reference files. The unused quality-checklist.md bundle is the clearest progressive-disclosure gap.
Suggestions
Link references/quality-checklist.md from the body (e.g. in a 'Before finishing' callout) so the provided bundle file is actually surfaced, and reconcile its divergent guidance (app-templates flat layout, npm run verify:images) with the body.
Extract the solutions authoring section and the image/brand-palette contract into separate reference files referenced one level deep from the body, reducing the main SKILL.md length.
Tighten editorial prose (e.g. the 'inspirational gallery, not a step-by-step manual guide' line) and de-duplicate the Public Vocabulary vs Internal Implementation Tiers framing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~350-line body is mostly domain-specific guidance that earns its place (registry contracts, SQL dialect rules, dry-run script), but editorial padding like 'an inspirational gallery of what's possible, not a step-by-step manual guide' and repetition between 'Public Vocabulary' and 'Internal Implementation Tiers' could be trimmed. It is not a 4 because several sections over-explain rationale that an agent could infer. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout: concrete file paths, a full example directory tree, registry mutation steps, and a runnable dry-run bash block covering the common deploy case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each authoring path (recipe, cookbook, example) is numbered end-to-end with explicit validation checkpoints ('Validate Before Finishing' 13-point list, 'pnpm fmt && typecheck && build && test') and a feedback loop for dry-run failures (fix in repo, re-copy, retry). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headings and a dedicated References block give real structure, but large chunks that belong in separate files (the solutions authoring guide, image contracts, brand palette table, full dry-run workflow) are inlined, and the one provided bundle file references/quality-checklist.md is never linked from the body. It is not a 4 because of the orphaned bundle reference and the heavy inlining. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |