Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, actionable instruction skill that appropriately offloads templates and topic examples to real bundle files. Its weakest area is workflow clarity, which lacks explicit validation checkpoints despite generating batch output with a hard constraint ('never include answer key').
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step before output, e.g. 'Before finalizing, verify no answer key or solutions are included and that every learning objective is covered by at least one question.'
De-duplicate the 'One per learning objective, or 3-5 covering main topics if no objectives' rule, which appears in both the Question Structure overview and the Type 1 Coverage section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows (e.g. it just says 'Use pdfplumber for text extraction'), but contains minor trimmable redundancy such as the coverage rule 'One per learning objective, or 3-5 covering main topics' repeated in both the Question Structure and Type 1 sections, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed.' | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete guidance — per-type question counts, required structures, and real example questions like 'Explain the bias-variance tradeoff...' — making the directions mostly executable, with only minor gaps (no inline code skeleton for the coding question), fitting 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps.' | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence exists (extract input content → generate questions in the ordered T/F, Explanatory, Coding, Use Case → format output), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops (e.g. verifying the answer key was omitted), fitting 'steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit.' | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-structured with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to real bundle files — templates 'in `assets/` folder' and 'examples_by_topic.md' 'in `references/` folder' — with core guidance inline and bulk material split out, fitting 'good structure; most content is appropriately placed; references mostly clear.' | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |