Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, highly actionable reference: ready-to-use templates plus decision tables that map output types and commands to the correct disclaimer level. Its only weakness is mild redundancy between the Full template and the attribution table.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient (templates and decision tables rather than padding), but the Full template and the "What to Attribute to AI vs. qsv" table overlap substantially, and the Regulatory Considerations prose could be tightened, matching the level-2 anchor of mostly efficient with some redundancy. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready Short/Medium/Full disclaimer templates, a level-selection decision table, an attribution/reproducibility matrix, and per-command integration guidance — concrete, executable material rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For a reference/template skill the "flow" is selection-and-apply: the "Choosing the Right Level" table plus the "Integration with Commands" list give an unambiguous path from output type to the right disclaimer, with no destructive/batch operation needing a validation loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with no bundle files and is organized into clearly delimited sections (When to Apply, Templates, Choosing the Right Level, Attribution, Integration, Regulatory), giving easy navigation without nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |