CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

review-respond

Respond to all pending review comments on the current PR — fetch comments, apply fixes, verify accuracy, test, commit, and reply. Use when addressing Copilot reviews, GitHub PR reviews, or any batch of review feedback.

79

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable workflow that gives concrete commands and named tools throughout, with an explicit verification gate before commit. It stays lean without padding and organizes a multi-step batch process clearly.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and purposeful — concrete commands and tool calls with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (no primers on git, PRs, or libraries); every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready executable guidance: gh api/CLI commands, named Serena and Context7 MCP tools with parameters, and specific test commands (cargo test -F all_features, npm test).

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Nine explicitly sequenced steps with a dedicated Step 5 'Verification gate' before commit — an explicit validation checkpoint on a batch operation, satisfying the feedback-loop requirement.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Single, well-organized SKILL.md with clearly headed sections and no nested/deep references; no bundle files are needed for this self-contained workflow, which fits the simple-skill allowance.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that names concrete actions, gives explicit 'Use when' triggers covering natural user phrasing, and stays in third person. It clearly distinguishes this skill from general code skills via PR-review-specific triggers.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates multiple concrete actions — 'fetch comments, apply fixes, verify accuracy, test, commit, and reply' — matching the top anchor for listing specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ('Respond to all pending review comments... fetch, apply, verify, test, commit, reply') and when ('Use when addressing Copilot reviews, GitHub PR reviews, or any batch of review feedback').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'Copilot reviews, GitHub PR reviews, or any batch of review feedback' are natural terms a user would say, with good coverage of the relevant variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche of PR review-comment response with distinct, specific triggers; written in third person and unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
dathere/qsv
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.