reddit-automation

Automate Reddit tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): search subreddits, create posts, manage comments, and browse top content. Always search tools first for current schemas.

1.68x

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

98%

1.68x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable Reddit-automation skill with concrete tool slugs and parameter values and clear workflow sequencing. Its weaknesses are some redundant/padded content, missing validation checkpoints on destructive operations, and an inline-heavy single-file structure.

Suggestions

Add an explicit verification step before destructive actions (e.g., confirm the resolved thing_id/fullname and target before calling delete), with a fix-and-retry loop on errors.

Remove the redundant "Known Pitfalls" content that duplicates the per-workflow Pitfalls, or consolidate pitfalls into one section to reduce token waste.

Trim the Markdown-formatting section, which explains concepts Claude already knows, keeping only Reddit-specific formatting notes (e.g., the r/ and u/ mention conventions).

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean (tool sequences, parameter enums, a quick-reference table), but explains concepts Claude already knows (the Markdown-formatting section) and repeats pitfalls across per-workflow sections and the "Known Pitfalls" section, so it could be tightened.	2 / 3
Actionability	Each workflow names exact tool slugs (e.g., REDDIT_CREATE_REDDIT_POST) with concrete parameter values (sort/time_filter enums, fullname prefixes like t3_abc123), giving copy-paste-ready actionable guidance appropriate for an MCP-tool-orchestration skill.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Workflows have clear numbered tool sequences with Required/Optional markers and the setup includes a validation checkpoint (confirm ACTIVE status), but destructive delete operations lack pre-action verification/feedback loops, which caps workflow clarity at 2 per the guidelines.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is a single well-organized file with clear sections and no nested/deep references, but everything is inline in a ~210-line document with redundant content (Known Pitfalls duplicating per-workflow pitfalls) rather than appropriately split or trimmed.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description with concrete actions and natural trigger terms, plus a clear Reddit niche. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit "Use when..." clause, which leaves the activation trigger implied rather than stated.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when the user wants to automate Reddit: searching subreddits, creating posts, managing comments, or browsing top content."

Consider adding common phrasing variants users might say (e.g. "post to a subreddit", "reply to a comment") to broaden trigger coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description enumerates four concrete actions — "search subreddits, create posts, manage comments, and browse top content" — matching the anchor for listing multiple specific concrete actions, and uses correct third-person voice.	3 / 3
Completeness	It clearly states what the skill does but lacks an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, so the "when" is only implied; per the guidelines, a missing explicit trigger caps completeness at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Natural user-facing terms like "search subreddits", "create posts", "manage comments", and "browse top content" give good coverage of phrases a user would actually say, beyond just "some relevant keywords".	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The Reddit-specific scope tied to "Rube MCP (Composio)" with distinct Reddit actions gives it a clear niche unlikely to conflict with other skills.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 1 missing	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: davepoon/buildwithclaude
Commit: 366e45b

Reviewed: about 23 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.