Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-structured for a delegating skill, but actionability and workflow clarity are held back by referenced checklists that are not defined and by the absence of validation checkpoints in the batch audit process. Progressive disclosure is excellent for a short single-purpose skill.
Suggestions
Define or link the referenced checklists (SIGN IN, TIME OUT, Non-Normal emergency) inline or via a reference file so Claude has the actual audit steps, not just their names.
Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints to the workflow (e.g. 'After the scan, confirm every OWASP category A01-A10 was evaluated before writing the report').
Make the numbered 'What This Skill Does' list an executable workflow with concrete commands or agent-delegation calls rather than a description of agent behavior.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept over-explanation, but the Example and Tips sections carry a little content that could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete invocation forms ('/security-audit', '/security-audit src/auth/') and an output path, but references checklists (SIGN IN, TIME OUT, Non-Normal) that are never defined here, leaving key execution details implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step sequence is listed, but it describes what the agent does rather than a workflow with validation checkpoints; as a batch operation with no feedback loops, workflow clarity is capped at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, and well-organized into clearly labeled sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |