Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestration skill with a clear five-phase workflow, explicit validation and error-recovery loops, and disciplined use of reference files. Its main weaknesses are a moderate amount of abstract policy prose and one reference file buried at a second nesting level.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body contains no explanations of concepts Claude already knows and is densely directive, but authorization/boundary statements recur across sections and some aphoristic policy sentences ('A failed parameter family is not a reason to try indefinitely') could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance includes the six-row decision-input table, exact read-triggers for each reference file, and specific routing rules ('Pin the code used for judgment to an immutable ref'), though a share of directives remain abstract principles and no examples of falsifiable acceptance criteria or probes are given. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced phases (bind, ground, decide, implement, verify/deliver) with an explicit error-recovery feedback loop ('When evidence fails, inspect raw signals, seek a falsifier and correct the root cause') and calibration of new guards on healthy and failing inputs, plus gated destructive/deployment boundaries. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Four one-level references are each well-signaled with when-to-read context and valid anchors, but feature-investigation.md is only reachable via a second-level link inside skill-composition.md and is never surfaced in the overview, so navigation is not perfectly one-level-deep. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |