Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, script-driven workflow: a routing table, exact executable commands per branch, strong validation and rollback checkpoints for config writes, and a cleanly signaled one-level-deep bundle. Its only weakness is localized verbosity around script-path resolution and repeated restart guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely dense, competent procedural instruction (routing table, exact commands, rollback rules), but the ~25-line installed-path resolution section ("When this Skill loads, the host exposes its installed path..." plus macOS/Linux and PowerShell variants) and the repeated start-a-new-thread instructions in both `apply` and "Report the outcome" are minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. This matches the 4 anchor; it is not 5 because not every token earns its place, and not 3 because the padding is localized rather than pervasive. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every routed intent has a complete executable command (e.g., `uv run --no-project python "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/codex_context_window.py" doctor --json`) with cross-platform variants and an explicit procedure for resolving the script path, covering all five branches. Copy-paste ready with specific examples for the common cases, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The routing table sequences intents to branches, `doctor` is required before `apply`, and the config-writing workflow has explicit validation checkpoints with feedback loops: "back up the original and check for concurrent edits", "Write atomically", "run the local `codex features list` configuration-load check", "Runs Codex strict-config diagnostics; a failure restores the exact prior bytes", and independent readback. This matches the 5 anchor (explicit validation, error-recovery loops) and exceeds the destructive-operation cap of 3. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Verified against the actual bundle: the body links `scripts/codex_context_window.py` (implementation detail) and `references/context_window_contract.md` (diagnostic semantics), both real files, one level deep, with the reference clearly signaled and purpose-scoped ("Read ... when diagnosing model caps, usable-window display, or compaction semantics"). Content is appropriately split with easy navigation, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |