CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

business-health-diagnostic

Diagnose SaaS business health across growth, retention, efficiency, and capital. Use when preparing a business review or prioritizing urgent fixes.

64

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/business-health-diagnostic/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A thorough, highly actionable SaaS health diagnostic with precise benchmarks and full output templates, but it is verbose and monolithic — the repeated template patterns and a broken examples/ reference limit conciseness and progressive-disclosure scores.

Suggestions

Collapse the four diagnostic output patterns into one parameterized template plus a short variant table, removing the repeated placeholder boilerplate to cut hundreds of lines.

Either create the referenced `examples/` folder with the three mini-examples or remove the 'See examples/ folder' pointer so references resolve to real files.

Move the detailed stage benchmarks and red-flag threshold tables into a separate reference file (e.g., references/benchmarks.md) and keep SKILL.md as an overview that links to it, improving progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The domain-specific benchmarks and thresholds earn their tokens, but the four near-duplicate full diagnostic output templates (Patterns 1-3 each spanning 100+ lines of placeholder boilerplate like '[Specific strength 1]') are padded and could be condensed into a shared template with variant notes.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides exact adaptive questions (Steps 0-3), precise numeric thresholds for every evaluation (e.g., 'LTV:CAC >3:1', 'Rule of 40 >40'), per-step ✅/⚠️/🚨 decision criteria, and copy-paste output templates plus three worked examples with metrics and diagnoses.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear Step 0 to Step 4 sequence with per-step 'Based on answers, agent evaluates' checkpoints and When-conditions for each diagnostic pattern; no explicit validate-retry loop, but this is a non-destructive diagnostic so the destructive-cap does not apply.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Section structure is reasonable and the workshop-facilitation reference is one-level and clearly signaled, but the file is monolithic (~780 lines) with bulky inline output templates, and the body references an `examples/` folder that does not exist in the bundle.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A tight, third-person description that cleanly states both capability and trigger conditions with concrete dimensions and occasions. It would benefit from a second action verb and a few more natural synonyms (board meeting, QBR, fundraise) to round out trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the SaaS domain and several concrete dimensions ('growth, retention, efficiency, and capital'), but relies on a single verb ('Diagnose') rather than listing multiple distinct actions, keeping it just below the comprehensive anchor 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Diagnose SaaS business health across growth, retention, efficiency, and capital') and when ('Use when preparing a business review or prioritizing urgent fixes') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users would say ('business review', 'urgent fixes') plus metric-family keywords, but omits common synonyms a user might actually utter like 'board meeting', 'QBR', 'quarterly review', or 'fundraising'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The holistic SaaS health diagnostic is a clear niche with distinct triggers, but there is minor overlap risk with closely related single-dimension finance skills (revenue-growth-metrics, economics-efficiency-metrics) referenced in the body.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (796 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.