Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill offers a well-sequenced, actionable JTBD workflow with useful templates and quality checks, but it is verbose and relies on bundle files (template.md, examples/sample.md) that are not actually present. Tightening the prose and either shipping or removing the broken references would materially improve it.
Suggestions
Trim the framework background and the repeated Ask/template/Examples/Quality-checks scaffolding — keep one concrete example per category and let the template file hold the full fill-in structure.
Either create the referenced `template.md` and `examples/sample.md` (and list them under references/) or remove the dead references from the body so navigation is not broken.
Add explicit validation checkpoints between steps (e.g., a quick quality-check gate before moving from Jobs to Pains) to make the workflow's feedback loops concrete rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lengthy and re-explains the JTBD framework, its Christensen/Osterwalder provenance, and a full taxonomy that Claude largely already knows, plus repeats a near-identical Ask/template/Examples/Quality-checks block for every sub-category. Useful examples earn it a 3 rather than 2, but it is noticeably padded and could be tightened substantially. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Each category provides a concrete Ask prompt, a fill-in markdown template, worked examples, and explicit quality checks (e.g., "Verb-driven," "Solution-agnostic"), giving mostly executable, specific guidance. It does not reach 5 because the templates are schematic placeholders rather than copy-paste-ready complete outputs. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Define Context → Explore Jobs → Identify Pains → Uncover Gains → Prioritize and Validate) with prioritization guidance in Step 5; the skill is non-destructive so the batch/destructive cap does not apply. It falls short of 5 because validation checkpoints and feedback loops between steps are implicit rather than explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body references `template.md` and `examples/sample.md`, but no references/, scripts/, assets/, or examples/ directories exist, so these are dead links pointing to missing bundle files, while the heavy template content is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split out. The structure is present but the referenced files are absent and bulk content that should be separate is inline. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |