Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured workflow with a stable output schema, a search-plan gate, and sharp domain rules, scoring well on workflow clarity. It loses points for prose that re-explains concepts Claude already knows and for progressive-disclosure references to bundle files (template.md, examples/) that are not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (template.md fill-in version and examples/sample.md, examples/sample-industrial.md) so the one-level-deep navigation actually resolves, or remove the links.
Trim Key Concepts and Common Pitfalls entries that re-teach market-analysis first principles (status quo as rival, analyst quadrants lagging) down to the rule itself, trusting Claude's existing knowledge.
Make the output schema's per-entry fields more directly copy-pasteable (literal labeled slots) so the actionable guidance is fully executable rather than bracketed placeholders.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~165-line body is mostly efficient and free of tutorial padding, but several Key Concepts and Common Pitfalls entries re-teach market-analysis principles Claude already knows ("the biggest rival is usually the status quo", "Analyst quadrants are a map someone else drew for their own purposes"), which could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete output schema, a 12-player cap, a dead-zone test, and Fact/Inference/Assumption labeling — real and specific guidance — but as an instruction-only skill the schema entries are described as bracketed placeholders rather than literal copy-paste fields, leaving execution partly inferred. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Application section sequences three clearly numbered steps (credit context / 3-bullet search plan / research-and-emit) with an explicit search-plan gate as a review checkpoint and labeled-assumption fallback; the only gap is an implicit rather than explicit re-validation step between the search-plan gate and schema emission. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to template.md and examples/sample.md, examples/sample-industrial.md are one level deep and clearly signaled, but those bundle files do not exist in the bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ dirs and no examples/ folder), so the promised fill-in template and worked examples are not actually present to navigate to. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |