Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, checkpointed workflow and a copy-paste output schema. Its weak spots are discursive prose that could be tightened and bundle references that point to files not present on disk.
Suggestions
Tighten the editorializing in Key Concepts and Common Pitfalls to bare directives (e.g., trim 'a map someone else drew for their own purposes' and 'it never shows up in a quadrant') to lift conciseness.
Resolve the dangling progressive-disclosure references: either add template.md and the examples/sample.md / examples/sample-industrial.md files the body points to, or remove the 'lives in' / 'See ... for a complete worked scan' pointers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient domain guidance, but Key Concepts and Common Pitfalls carry rhetorical editorializing ('a map someone else drew for their own purposes', 'it never shows up in a quadrant') that could be tightened to bare directives. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | A concrete step sequence plus an exact, copy-paste-ready output schema with field-level structure and bullet counts gives fully executable guidance for an instruction skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 3-step sequence with explicit checkpoints — the search-plan gate ('continue unless revised'), the mandatory dead-zone counter-reading, and the do-not-invent checklist — matches the validation-checkpoints anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are clearly signaled and one level deep, but template.md, examples/sample.md, and examples/sample-industrial.md are referenced yet do not exist on disk, so navigation is broken rather than score-3 clean. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |