Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and clearly sequenced with embedded quality checks and refinement loops, but it is verbose for its length and keeps the entire question bank, examples, and pitfalls inline rather than progressively disclosing them into bundle files.
Suggestions
Remove the redundant Purpose paragraph (it restates the frontmatter intent verbatim) and trim the 'Why This Works' and 'Anti-Patterns' sections to the essential bits, since Claude already understands positioning and discovery concepts.
Move the two worked examples and the five Common Pitfalls into a separate references/ file (e.g. examples.md), keeping SKILL.md as an overview that links to it — this raises progressive disclosure from inline-heavy to appropriately split.
Consolidate the per-question enumerated option banks (which repeat the same B2B SMB example across Q1-Q5) into a single adaptation table or reference file to cut repeated tokens while preserving actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient domain guidance, but the "Why This Works" and "Anti-Patterns (What This Is NOT)" sections plus the Purpose paragraph (which restates the frontmatter intent nearly verbatim) are padding Claude does not need, fitting "mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation" rather than lean (anchor 3). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Each question supplies exact prompts, 3-4 enumerated options with concrete examples (e.g., "B2B: SMB decision-makers — Small business owners (10-50 employees)"), adaptation tips, and a fill-in output template, giving copy-paste-ready instruction-only guidance rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow is explicitly sequenced (Step 0 gather context → Questions 1-5 → Output statement → Next Steps), with inline quality checks (Q4 "Avoid features... Focus on outcomes") and a feedback loop in Next Steps ("If target feels too broad → Narrow further"; stress-test with 5 customers), matching clear sequence with validation/refinement. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled and one-level-deep (e.g., "Use [`workshop-facilitation`]... as the default interaction protocol"; "uses `positioning-statement.md`"), but no bundle files exist and the full question bank, two worked examples, and five pitfalls all live inline in a ~415-line SKILL.md, so content that could be separate is inline (anchor 2) rather than appropriately split (anchor 3). | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |