Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable methodology with a strong worked example and clearly sequenced checkpointed steps, though it carries some motivational padding that slightly reduces token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but includes motivational rationale ("Most PM stakeholder lists are written from memory in five minutes...") and persuasive padding that could be tightened without losing instruction, matching the mostly-efficient-but-could-be-tightened anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, specific guidance — defined R/P/D tags, exact bias-check questions, a 4-6 minute timing, and a full worked example with tagged stakeholders — and as an instruction-only skill it is complete with no missing key details, matching the concrete-specific-examples anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-6 are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoint steps (the equity lens in Step 4 and bias check in Step 5) acting as quality gates, matching the clear-sequence-with-explicit-validation anchor; no destructive/batch cap applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clear sections (Purpose, Input, Key Concepts, Application, Examples, Common Pitfalls, References) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references and no nested or monolithic structure, matching the well-organized overview anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |