Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and a worked example. The only real weakness is conciseness — the Purpose section and several framing passages could be trimmed without losing clarity.
Suggestions
Trim the Purpose section to avoid restating the description and the Key Concepts framing; let the Application steps carry the method.
Consider moving the full worked Example or the quadrant-by-quadrant Key Concepts into a reference file to shorten the main body while keeping it one click away.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Almost all content is method-specific knowledge rather than padding about concepts Claude already knows, but the Purpose section restates the description and several passages ('Running only the first grid optimizes for managing relationships with the powerful...') are discursive and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Step 1-5 give concrete assessment questions, per-quadrant engagement strategies, explicit migration actions (e.g. 'Q1 -> Q2: Actively recruit them into advisory processes, discovery research, and requirements review'), plus a fully worked example — copy-ready guidance for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (run Power x Interest, run Impact x Power, compare for gaps, plan migration, feed into engagement) where the Step 3 comparison acts as the method's built-in validation checkpoint; no destructive/batch step requires an explicit validate-fix-retry loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the body is organized into well-delineated sections (Purpose, Input, Key Concepts, Application, Examples, Common Pitfalls, References) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to sibling skills and MITRE sources. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |