Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable methodology skill with a clear five-step workflow and a strong worked example. Its main weakness is moderate verbosity from repeated rationale and the 'use both grids' message restated across multiple sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'run both grids, not one' rationale so it appears once (e.g., in Purpose) instead of being restated in Key Concepts and Common Pitfalls.
Trim illustrative rationale paragraphs (e.g., 'Running only the first grid optimizes for managing relationships with the powerful') to the essential methodological point.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint in Step 3 — e.g., 'confirm each stakeholder appears on both grids and flag any placement you are unsure of' — to strengthen the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and the methodology is legitimate skill content, but the 'run both grids, not one' message is repeated across Purpose, Key Concepts ('Paired Variables'), and Common Pitfalls, and rationale paragraphs like 'Running only the first grid optimizes for managing relationships with the powerful' add padding that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The Application section gives concrete per-quadrant actions (co-design sessions, weekly touchpoints, executive briefings), explicit comparison questions, specific migration moves, and a fully worked example — actionable guidance with only minor directional remnants like 'design 1:1 engagement to address those concerns'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps (run Power × Interest, run Impact × Power, compare, plan migration, feed into planning) with the comparison step acting as a checkpoint; no destructive/batch validation cap applies, though an explicit verification of placement consistency is not called out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Purpose, Input, Key Concepts, Application, Examples, Pitfalls, References) with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to sibling skills; no bundle files exist so the body is self-contained, but nothing is split into separate files, keeping it just short of the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |