Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-sequenced evidence-cited SWOT workflow with a copy-paste schema, explicit validation checkpoints, and a pitfalls checklist. Progressive disclosure is well-designed but the referenced bundle files (template.md, examples/*.md) are absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the missing bundle files referenced in the body — `template.md`, `examples/sample.md`, and `examples/sample-industrial.md` are linked but absent from the bundle, so progressive-disclosure navigation breaks.
Alternatively, remove those links until the files exist so the skill carries no dangling references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and substantive with no basic-concept padding — it assumes Claude knows what a SWOT is and spends tokens on protocol, discipline, and a copy-paste schema rather than explanation. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste output schema, a numbered 4-step procedure, per-quadrant ranking rules (max 5, ranked by defensibility/exploitability), a 4-option Final Step menu, and a do-not-invent list — concrete and executable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step Application sequence with explicit checkpoints — the search-plan gate ('Continue unless revised'), quadrant reclassification on disguised strategies, and the decision-support sentence as a pass/fail test — plus a pitfalls checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level-deep references (template.md, examples/sample.md, examples/sample-industrial.md) with annotated links, but none of these bundle files actually exist in the bundle, so the disclosure path is broken — caps this at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |