Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill with a clear multi-step workflow and concrete templates, but it is let down by redundancy between sections and references to bundle files (template.md, examples/sample.md) that are missing.
Suggestions
Remove the verbatim duplication of the description in the Purpose section, and either drop "Anti-Patterns" or "Common Pitfalls" or merge them so each anti-pattern appears once.
Create the referenced template.md and examples/sample.md (or remove the references), and move the inline markdown templates into template.md so the body stays an overview pointing one level deep.
Trim "Why This Structure Works" to the non-obvious points only, since user-centric/outcome-focused/testable are self-evident from the format itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The Purpose section repeats the frontmatter description verbatim, and "Anti-Patterns (What This Is NOT)" overlaps heavily with "Common Pitfalls" (same developer-refactor, "As a user", and multiple When/Then examples); "Why This Structure Works" restates fairly obvious points, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete fill-in markdown templates for the use case and acceptance criteria, ✅/❌ good/bad examples, a mini worked example, and a real executable helper script (scripts/user-story-template.py). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Five explicitly sequenced steps (Gather Context → Use Case → Acceptance Criteria → Summary → Validate and Refine) with an explicit validation/refinement checklist checkpoint in Step 5. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections and one-level-deep references, but the body points to template.md and examples/sample.md that do not exist in the bundle, and the templates are kept inline rather than moved into the referenced template file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |