Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent reference skill: executable code for every common path, dense non-obvious gotchas, and clean separation of overview from external detail. The only soft spot is the absence of an explicit validate/retry loop in the streaming workflow, which is minor given the skill's nature.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout — quick starts and the interim/final flag-semantics bullets are dense and assume competence; no space wasted explaining what a WebSocket or SDK is. 'request= accepts raw bytes or an iterator of bytes' is exactly the kind of non-obvious detail that earns its tokens. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready, executable code for every common case — REST URL, REST file, live WebSocket with real handlers, AsyncDeepgramClient, and the deferred-callback webhook pattern — each with concrete params and exact method names. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The WebSocket example is a clear, ordered sequence (open → register handlers → start_listening in a thread → send chunks → send_finalize → close) with key checkpoints like 'send_finalize before exiting or the last partial is dropped'. It lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop, but the skill is not a destructive/batch operation, so no cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references out to reference.md, the canonical OpenAPI/AsyncAPI URLs, Context7, product docs, and named example/test files in the repo — the body stays an overview while detail lives elsewhere. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |