Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered operational skill: the pipeline is clearly sequenced with strong validation checkpoints and a copy-paste review prompt, and commands are concrete. The main weaknesses are inline bulk material that belongs in one-level-deep reference files, plus some over-explanation (dated incident narrative, repeated rules) and uninvoked tool references.
Suggestions
Move the standard review prompt template, the 计数同步清单, and the C8–C13 lint catalog into references/ files (e.g. references/review-prompt.md, references/count-sync.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Trim the 2026-07-27 incident narrative to a one-line rule (「数图用 `curl <url> | grep -c '<figure'` 交叉验证，不能只看渲染正文」) and drop the 相关 section's re-explanation of the ④ 分流规则, which duplicates earlier content.
Give concrete invocations (or config paths) for baoyu-url-to-markdown and baoyu-translate in stage ①/②, so the fetch and translate steps are as executable as the validate step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence (no basics explained), but the dated incident narrative (「2026-07-27 的教训：…」), the C13 rationale paragraph, and the 相关 section re-explaining the ④ 分流规则 are over-explanation that could be trimmed. It fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the lean level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands (`bash scripts/check-consistency.sh`, `curl <url> | grep -c '<figure'`), exact file paths, required frontmatter fields, and a copy-paste review prompt template make the guidance mostly executable. Minor gaps keep it below 5: the baoyu-url-to-markdown and baoyu-translate tools are named but never given an invocation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-stage pipeline is clearly sequenced with an explicit non-skippable human gate, a pre-ingest checklist, and validate-before-commit enforcement (C1–C13 全绿) plus per-lint failure descriptions — matching the level-5 anchor of checklists, explicit validation, and error-recovery feedback loops for a batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files at all, and the ~97-line body inlines material that belongs in separate reference files: the full review prompt template, the 计数同步清单, and the C8–C13 lint catalog. Sections are well-headed, but this is 'some structure… content that should be separate is inline' (3), not the appropriately split level-4/5 structure. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |