CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

omni-budget

Configure spending limits, token quotas, and rate-limit policies per API key or globally. Inspect current consumption and enforce cost controls across providers.

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/omni-budget/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A compact, well-sectioned reference whose GET example is executable, but whose POST example is an empty placeholder and whose update workflow has no verification step. The Overview also duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim.

Suggestions

Show a realistic POST payload with actual rate-limit fields instead of '-d "{}"' so the update operation is executable.

Add a verification step after POST /api/rate-limit (e.g., re-run the GET to confirm the applied configuration).

Drop the Overview section that duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim to save tokens.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean body with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the Overview section repeats the frontmatter description verbatim — a redundant block that could be trimmed. Not 5 because of that duplicated token spend.

4 / 5

Actionability

The GET example is copy-paste ready, but the POST example ships '-d "{}"' — an empty placeholder with no payload fields — so the update operation cannot actually be executed from what is written. Not 4 because the missing payload schema is a key detail, not a minor gap.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Endpoints are listed in a coherent order, but updating global/per-key rate-limit and spend policies is a mutating, high-impact operation with no verification checkpoint (e.g., re-GET to confirm the applied config), which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the rubric guidelines. Not 2 because the sequence that exists is coherent and the auth prerequisite is explicit.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized short sections with payload detail deferred one level deep to 'GET /api/openapi/spec' or 'docs/openapi.yaml', clearly signaled. Not 5 because the deferred payload detail has no bundle file backing here and the placeholder POST example leaves the main file with a gap.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, third-person description naming several concrete capabilities with good trigger keywords, but it lacks any 'when to use' guidance, capping completeness at 3. Adding natural synonyms like 'budget' and 'usage' would strengthen trigger coverage further.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause such as 'Use when the user asks about API costs, budgets, quotas, or rate limits.'

Include natural synonyms users would say — 'budget', 'usage', 'billing', 'spend cap' — to broaden trigger term coverage.

Mention reading the OpenAPI spec for full request/response schemas as a concrete capability.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — 'Configure spending limits, token quotas, and rate-limit policies', 'Inspect current consumption', 'enforce cost controls' — with explicit scoping ('per API key or globally') in third-person voice. Not 5 because coverage has minor gaps (e.g., the OpenAPI spec surface and auth setup are part of the skill's real capabilities but go unmentioned).

4 / 5

Completeness

Has a clear 'what' (configure limits, inspect consumption, enforce cost controls) but no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guidelines. Not 2 because the 'what' is specific and multi-part, not vague.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains natural phrases users would say: 'spending limits', 'token quotas', 'rate-limit', 'cost controls', 'consumption'. Not 5 because common synonyms like 'budget', 'usage', 'billing', or 'spend cap' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Distinct niche (rate-limit and spend-policy administration per API key) with domain-specific triggers. Not 5 because 'enforce cost controls across providers' is broad enough to overlap with generic cost-optimization or billing skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

diegosouzapw/OmniRoute

Path

skills/omni-budget/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.