CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

error-tracking

Add Sentry v8 error tracking and performance monitoring to your services. Use this skill when adding error handling, creating new controllers, instrumenting cron jobs, or tracking database performance. ALL ERRORS MUST BE CAPTURED TO SENTRY - no exceptions.

65

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/error-tracking/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is error-tracking in diet103/claude-code-infrastructure-showcase

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with concrete, executable Sentry v8 patterns and good coverage of cases, but it suffers from verbosity and duplication and offers no progressive disclosure via separate files. Workflow guidance is pattern-based rather than a clearly sequenced, validated process.

Suggestions

Remove the duplicated Notifications Service instrument.ts block (identical to the API Service one) and collapse the repeated Sentry span examples into one canonical pattern to cut tokens.

Add a numbered 'Integration workflow' section with explicit validation checkpoints (e.g., verify DSN is set, trigger a test error, confirm it appears in Sentry before proceeding).

Move per-service examples and the config.ini reference into separate reference files and link to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly actionable code but is padded with redundancy — the API Service and Notifications Service instrument.ts blocks are near-identical, and the Error Levels list plus duplicated span examples repeat concepts without adding value.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides numerous executable TypeScript snippets, concrete curl test commands, and for every domain helper supplies a 'universally-available' direct Sentry equivalent so the guidance is copy-paste ready even without the helper.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Patterns and an implementation checklist are present, but there is no sequenced integration workflow with explicit validation checkpoints or a validate-fix-retry feedback loop, leaving the multi-step process implicit.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No reference, script, or asset bundle files exist, so the ~360-line SKILL.md is a monolithic document; it has section structure but content like per-service examples and configuration could be split into referenced files.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

90%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states both capability and explicit use-when triggers around Sentry v8 integration. The only real weakness is the second-person voice and the aggressive ALL-CAPS mandate adding noise.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person ('Adds Sentry v8 error tracking...') and drop the second-person 'your services' to match the expected description voice.

Remove the ALL-CAPS 'ALL ERRORS MUST BE CAPTURED TO SENTRY - no exceptions.' mandate from the description; it is an enforcement rule, not a capability statement, and belongs in the body.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names concrete actions like 'creating new controllers, instrumenting cron jobs, or tracking database performance', but the second-person phrasing 'your services' and the padded ALL-CAPS mandate keep it from the top anchor listing multiple cleanly specific actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly states what it does ('Add Sentry v8 error tracking and performance monitoring') and when to use it via a 'Use this skill when...' clause with multiple concrete triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users would say — 'adding error handling', 'creating new controllers', 'instrumenting cron jobs', 'tracking database performance' — giving good coverage of likely trigger language.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Sentry v8 error tracking and performance monitoring' niche is clearly scoped and unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
diet103/claude-code-infrastructure-showcase
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.