CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

daytona-electron-den

Electron and Den, desktop plus cloud, two-sandbox e2e, cloud auth, marketplace, org policy, signed preview routing, provider sync, desktop handoff. Validate Electron against a Daytona Den server with unified proof.

64

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.opencode/skills/daytona-electron-den/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong validation checkpoints, making it an effective executable workflow. The main improvement is moving the dense inline cheat-sheet material into a one-level-deep reference file once a bundle is warranted.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; a few prose passages (e.g., the renderer navigation cheat-sheet) could be tightened slightly, so it is efficient with minor trim opportunities rather than perfectly lean.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready bash, curl, daytona exec, and JavaScript snippets covering the common cases (server start, Electron launch, bootstrap validation, desktop handoff deep-link dispatch), with specific flags and expected outputs.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear multi-step sequence (Server Sandbox -> Electron -> Validate Bootstrap -> Desktop Handoff -> Marketplace/Policy/Provider Sync -> Evidence) with explicit validation checkpoints (health checks, bootstrap assertion, the 5-step flow-validator loop) and a minimum-assertions checklist for error recovery.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested references, but at ~120 lines it inlines dense material (the renderer cheat-sheet and marketplace details) that, with bundle files present, could live one level deep; structure is good with minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a precise, distinctive niche and concrete capabilities, but it omits an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause and leans on jargon tags over natural user phrasing. Adding a trigger clause and softer synonyms would lift completeness and trigger-term quality.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when ...' clause naming the situations that should trigger this skill (e.g., 'Use when end-to-end testing the Electron desktop app against a Daytona Den cloud server').

Convert the noun-phrase tag list into verb-led actions so each capability reads as something the skill does, improving specificity.

Include a couple of natural-language synonyms or phrasings a user might actually say alongside the technical terms to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete capabilities ('cloud auth, marketplace, org policy, signed preview routing, provider sync, desktop handoff') plus a concrete action ('Validate Electron against a Daytona Den server with unified proof'), but the capability list is a noun-phrase tag dump rather than verb phrases, leaving minor gaps in how each is exercised.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear and comprehensive, but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Domain-accurate terms a developer would plausibly say (Electron, Den, cloud auth, provider sync, desktop handoff) are present, but the language is jargon-heavy and lacks common variations, synonyms, or file extensions.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clearly delineated niche (Daytona Den + Electron two-sandbox e2e) with distinct, specialized triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
different-ai/openwork
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.