CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

daytona-electron-den

Electron and Den, desktop plus cloud, two-sandbox e2e, cloud auth, marketplace, org policy, worker proxy, provider sync, desktop handoff. Validate Electron against a Daytona Den server with unified proof.

67

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.opencode/skills/daytona-electron-den/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is exceptionally actionable, concise, and well-sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints for a fragile e2e workflow. The only gap is progressive disclosure: external references are named but not present or clearly signaled as navigable bundle files.

Suggestions

If .devcontainer scripts and the daytona-flow-validator loop are part of this skill, add them to the bundle (scripts/) and reference them as clearly signaled one-level-deep links.

If those resources live elsewhere, make their provenance explicit so the reader knows they are repository-relative paths, not skill-bundle files.

Consider splitting the long Desktop Handoff / Marketplace sections into a reference file once they grow, keeping SKILL.md as an overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, explaining no known concepts (no 'what is Electron' or 'what is a sandbox') and packing every section with concrete commands or code.

3 / 3

Actionability

It provides fully executable bash commands, real JS snippets, specific flags (--require-signin, --record-video), and exact UI text matches ('Run task', 'Ready for new tasks') — copy-paste ready.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequenced workflow (server sandbox → health → Electron → bootstrap → handoff → features → evidence) with the daytona-flow-validator loop as an explicit assert/act/assert/capture checklist and expected-vs-actual validation checkpoints.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clear sections, but referenced external resources (.devcontainer/*.sh, daytona-flow-validator) are not part of the skill bundle and no one-level-deep reference structure exists, so it stops short of the clean overview-plus-references pattern.

2 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and occupies a clearly distinct niche, but it lacks an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause and relies on technical jargon over natural user phrasing. Adding a 'Use when...' clause and more conversational trigger terms would lift its weakest dimensions.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g. 'Use when testing Electron against a Daytona Den server end-to-end.'

Soften jargon with natural phrasings users would actually say, such as 'test Electron against Den', 'cloud sign-in', or 'install marketplace extensions'.

Lead with the core verb-action ('Validate Electron against a Daytona Den server end-to-end') before the comma-separated feature list.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names many concrete capabilities ('cloud auth, marketplace, org policy, worker proxy, provider sync, desktop handoff', 'two-sandbox e2e') rather than vague language, matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

The 'what' is clear, but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 2 per the rubric guideline.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It has relevant domain keywords ('Electron', 'Den', 'Daytona', 'cloud', 'desktop', 'e2e') but leans technical-jargon-heavy ('worker proxy', 'provider sync', 'desktop handoff') and misses natural phrasings a user would say.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche ('Electron against a Daytona Den server', 'desktop plus cloud, two-sandbox e2e') is unmistakable and specific, making it clearly distinguishable and unlikely to trigger for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
different-ai/openwork
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.