Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a high-quality, actionable validation playbook with executable commands, explicit validation/repair feedback loops, and clear sequencing. Its main weakness is the absence of bundle files to offload the longer command catalogs, leaving a fairly long single document.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operational and command-dense, assuming Claude's competence, but sections like Screenshots and Human-Visible Demo Standard carry prose rules that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste ready bash snippets, a runnable synthetic-paste JS function, and concrete browser_screenshot/daytona exec commands cover the common cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Explicit 5-step Observe-Act-Observe-Assert-Capture and Repair loops with validation checkpoints, plus failure-handling feedback loops and a Final Verdict checklist, sequence the work clearly. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, but the single file is well-sectioned with clearly signaled cross-skill references (prove-a-pr, write-a-spec, run-tests, daytona-recording-artifacts); some inline command catalogs could move to reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |