Conciseness

Lean and dense with operational facts only — no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, and even context sentences carry triage value ("They never change the evidence verdict, but a note marked *Worth fixing* is a defect a careful designer would send back"). The brief "no longer / older PRs" clauses are current-state facts rather than date-conditional branching, so they don't warrant the time-sensitivity penalty.

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: a copy-paste-ready gh-api check() function, the exact reproduce command ("pnpm evals:e2e <slug> --local && pnpm --dir evals design:review -- --test-run latest --json"), and environment prerequisites ("judged notes need OPENAI_API_KEY or ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"). Placeholders like <pr> are standard parameterization, not pseudocode.

Workflow Clarity

The five-step "Reproduce, fix, verify" sequence has explicit validation with a feedback loop ("Re-run the same command. The note must be gone and no new *Worth fixing* note may appear") plus a human-judgment checkpoint ("Look at the screenshot yourself"), and step 5 states the CI-verified end state. Not a destructive/batch operation, so no cap applies.

Progressive Disclosure

A single-purpose skill with no bundle files, organized into four clear sections (read the notes, reproduce/fix/verify, the exception path, rules). References to evals/design-review/rubric.md and DESIGN.md are one level deep and clearly signaled, and nothing inlined warrants its own file.

Specificity

Names three concrete actions spanning the full task ("read what the design review found on a PR's screenshots, fix it in code, and prove the note is gone"), which meets "several specific actions" but stops at the core loop, and "prove the note is gone" is less concrete than the read/fix verbs.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ("read… fix it in code, and prove the note is gone") and when (front-loaded concrete trigger phrases, equivalent to a "Use when…" clause). The when-guidance is already explicit and specific, so it exceeds anchor 4.

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural triggers — "Design notes on a PR", "worth fixing", "a reviewer says the UI looks off" — alongside the exact check name ("Design review (advisory)") and rule identifiers (layout.split-row, OW-LIST); no obvious synonym a user would actually say is missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche with distinct repo-specific triggers (Evidence preview check, OW-LIST, layout.split-row); no plausible overlap with a generic skill, so minimal conflict risk.