Publish test evidence, publish all test runs, update PR verification, audit red evidence, prove a PR, or declare a PR verdict. Use after @openwork/testkit runs.
67
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
The orchestrator owns this verdict and human-verification step. It derives the verdict from completed evidence; publishing makes that verdict inspectable and never reruns a test.
Passed: every claim has an observable assertion in the completed test run.Failed: an assertion disproves at least one expected outcome.Incomplete: requirements, tooling, or evidence are missing. A skip is always
Incomplete, never Passed.Incomplete.<!-- test-evidence --> marker. The publisher recognizes old sticky
markers only to update comments created before the migration.Run checks on the final PR head after any rebase or cherry-pick. Test runs are
bound to a commit SHA, so history rewrites require rerunning and republishing.
After a multi-test run, publish each test run whose gitSha matches the PR head:
pnpm evals:e2e --publish --pr <n> --test-run <dir|name>evals:e2e --publish judges pending visual validations in the selected test
run, then publishes it. It publishes existing @openwork/testkit evidence, not legacy
flows, and never reruns tests.
--test-run selects the most recent test run; pass it explicitly
when several runs exist so each test's evidence is published deliberately.0 published, 1 failed claims published (or publish failed),
2 pending claims still need judging (set a vision key and rerun).gh pr view <n> --json baseRefName,headRefName,headRefOid before
merging. A merged base can retarget the stack and recreate commits with new
SHAs, orphaning their evidence.git log --oneline <branch> ^origin/dev. If the
stack is wrong, cherry-pick only the intended commits onto current dev, then
rerun and republish every check.--force to hide a SHA mismatch. Re-run the spec on the PR head.--force only to deliberately publish historical or red test evidence. The
output is annotated; call the exception out explicitly. Red tapes are valid
human-verification artifacts and should be published when they explain a
Failed or Incomplete verdict.gh pr comment --attach (gh ≥ 2.99). Without it
the publisher still posts verdicts with a no-screenshots note.9f0e880
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.