review-a-contributor-pr
Review a fork PR, review an external contributor PR, check provenance (DCO) and ee/ CLA, run /test, carry a fork commit into a same-repo branch, is this PR safe to merge. Checklist for pull requests from forks before a human approves or merges them.
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The workflow reviews GitHub pull requests and commits from external contributors, reading PR metadata, diffs, and commit messages via the GitHub CLI (`gh pr view`, `gh pr diff`, `gh api`), which introduces an indirect prompt injection risk from untrusted PR content.
- Repository
different-ai/openwork
- Revision
448fb86
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.