Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction-only skill with concrete criteria, illustrative examples, and a prescriptive output template; its only weakness is minor verbosity in one clarifying example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, never explaining what specs or test helpers are; the pricing-example clarification is somewhat verbose and could be trimmed, keeping it just below the fully-lean anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, actionable guidance throughout: an 'ALL of these hold' criterion, three reportable examples, a detailed do-not-report list, and a prescriptive output template; the residual judgment of identifying a concrete broken behavior keeps it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A coherent review sequence (scope → question → criteria → exclusions → output format) with a terminal checkpoint ('If that evidence is missing, report nothing'); as a read-only analysis task it needs no validate-fix loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained, under 50 lines, with well-organized sections and no external references needed, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |