CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

upload-photo

Attach a screenshot/image/video to a PR or issue, or embed an image in a GitHub comment.

67

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, highly actionable skill: every command is executable as written, the single-purpose flow is unambiguous, and the 28-line body is appropriately self-contained. The only real deduction is the unpinned-location version requirement, which will age; otherwise this is exemplary token efficiency.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean: no concept explanations, no padding, and every command earns its place. Not 5 because the time-sensitive version pin "GitHub CLI 2.99 or newer" is not placed in an 'old patterns'/'deprecated' section, which the guidelines penalize; not 3: there is no unnecessary explanation beyond that version check.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (gh --version, gh pr/issue comment --attach with the #alt-text syntax, the printf | gh pr comment --body-file - embed recipe, and the gh api --jq .body URL read-back) cover the common cases. Not 4: there are no gaps or pseudocode — each recipe runs as written.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple, single-purpose skill whose core action (attach a file to a comment) is unambiguous, and it opens with a pre-flight check (gh --version / upgrade). Per the simple-skill scoring note, no multi-step validation workflow is required; no destructive or batch operations apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is under 50 lines with no need for external references, and the content is well-organized and reads cleanly top-to-bottom (version check → attach → embed → URL retrieval), satisfying the simple-skill exception. No bundle files exist to verify, and none are needed.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A crisp, third-person description with concrete actions and a clearly distinct niche. Its main weakness is the missing "Use when..." trigger clause, which both caps completeness and leaves invocation guidance implicit. Trigger-term coverage is good but could include common synonyms.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when the user wants to attach, upload, or embed a screenshot, image, or video in a GitHub PR, issue, or comment."

Broaden trigger terms with natural synonyms users say — "picture", "photo", "GIF", "upload an image to GitHub" — to improve recall.

Consider mentioning the supporting capability surfaced in the body (reading back the uploaded asset URL) so the "what" covers the skill's full scope.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names concrete actions ("Attach", "embed") against a specific domain ("a PR or issue", "a GitHub comment"), with several distinct capabilities listed. It falls short of 5 because coverage has minor gaps (e.g., retrieving the asset URL or attaching during PR/issue creation is not mentioned), but exceeds 3 which expects only 1-2 concrete actions.

4 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clearly stated (attach/embed media on GitHub), but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3. Not 4: the "when" is not merely implicit — it is entirely absent.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage — "screenshot", "image", "video", "PR", "issue", "GitHub", "embed" — matching phrases a user would actually say. Not 5: common synonyms and variations like "picture", "photo", "GIF", or "upload" are missing; not 3: the terms present are natural, not generic jargon.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Attach a screenshot/image/video to a PR or issue" occupies a clear niche with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for the wrong skill. Not 4: no closely related skill would realistically claim these triggers (screenshot + GitHub PR/issue attachment).

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
different-ai/openwork
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.