Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a highly actionable, well-sequenced A-share prediction methodology with strong validation gates, but is verbose and ships as a monolithic file rather than using progressive disclosure to split out the template, visualization, and glossary material.
Suggestions
Move the terminology dictionary, full report template, and visualization specs into separate reference files (e.g. references/report-template.md, references/glossary.md) and link to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure and reduce token load.
Trim general-knowledge explanations (e.g. what MACD/KDJ/MA5 are) and keep only the A-share-specific nuances (T+1, 涨停板 ±10%, 龙虎榜, 封单) that Claude would not reliably infer.
Consolidate the redundant output-format prescriptions—the 30-second summary block, full report template, and ASCII chart templates overlap; keep one canonical template and reference it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The PACE scoring methodology, search templates, and numeric thresholds earn their place as proprietary domain content, but the ~570-line body includes padding—especially the terminology dictionary explaining general concepts (MACD, KDJ, MA5) Claude already knows and redundant ASCII output-format templates—that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready search query strings, concrete point-allocation tables with numeric thresholds, a fully specified Step 1–6 execution flow, a report template with placeholders, and explicit risk parameters (-3% hard stop, position tiers) give directly executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints—a 12-item pre-output self-check checklist, three-scenario probabilities that must sum to 100%, and a feedback loop for incomplete data that lowers confidence and takes mid-range dimension scores. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good in-file section structure, but it is a single ~570-line document with no external references; the report template, visualization specs, and terminology dictionary are inlined rather than offloaded to one-level-deep reference files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |