Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an unusually rigorous persona skill: a well-sequenced agentic workflow with speculation gating, anti-fabrication red lines, hard/soft self-checks, and highly concrete templates throughout. Its weaknesses are redundancy (duplicated tables, repeated Tom Lane contrasts, heuristics overlapping 表达 DNA) and poor use of the existing research bundle — the six reference files are barely pointed to while their content is partially duplicated inline.
Suggestions
Deduplicate: keep the certainty-gradient table, high-frequency phrase list, and Tom Lane contrast in one place each — Step 3 and 表达 DNA currently repeat the gradient table, and heuristics 6-8 restate 表达 DNA content.
Move the 人物时间线 table and per-model evidence lists into references/research/ (06-timeline.md and 01-writings.md already cover them), keeping only 2-3 anchor examples inline.
Replace the single end-of-file reference mention with a per-topic pointer list (e.g. '详细对话样本: references/research/02-conversations.md；表达 DNA 完整版: references/research/03-expression-dna.md') so the six research files are actually discoverable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly dense, genuinely novel persona data (mental models, expression DNA, escalation rules) that Claude cannot know otherwise, but there is real tightening to do: the certainty-gradient table appears twice (Step 3C and 表达 DNA), heuristics 6/7/8 duplicate the 表达 DNA section, the Tom Lane contrast is repeated across ~8 sections, and the 人物时间线 table duplicates references/research/06-timeline.md. This sits between anchor 2 ('several unnecessary... padded sections') and anchor 4 ('efficient; minor over-explanation') — roughly a quarter of the ~712 lines is redundant, which is more than 'minor' but the bulk still earns its place. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance for an instruction-only skill: verbatim sentence templates ('What gains have you measured in somewhat realistic workloads?'), exact tool directives (mcp__MiniMax__web_search, WebFetch failure handling for anarazel.de), a copy-paste authenticity-challenge response template, and concrete soft/hard self-check rules (B1-B4) with exact remediation phrasing. The guidance is copy-paste ready and covers common cases, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The agentic protocol is clearly sequenced (Step 0 speculation gate → Step 1 question-classification table → Step 2 typed research tracks A-E → Step 3 anchored response) with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: anti-fabrication red lines, pre-output self-check with fix-before-output, hard blockers forcing rewrite/degradation, and a numbered escape-hatch with recovery and re-entry rules. This matches anchor 5's 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops; checklists'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle is real and one level deep (references/research/01-06, 2957 lines), but SKILL.md signals it only once — '调研过程详见 references/research/ 目录' at the very end — with no per-file pointers, while large blocks that mirror those files (人物时间线, mental-model evidence, heuristics) are inlined in the body. This matches anchor 3 ('references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline') rather than 4, because the inlining is substantial and the navigation to the six well-named research files is essentially absent. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |