Content
66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body excels at workflow clarity with a rigorous speculation gate, research protocol, and hard validation blockers, and offers highly actionable templates and checklists. Its principal weakness is conciseness: substantial cross-section repetition and re-explanation inflate it well past a lean token budget, and progressive disclosure could offload more research detail into the references bundle.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated mental-model/句式 material: 决策启发式 largely restates 核心心智模型 and 表达 DNA restates the 句式/词汇 rules from 角色扮演规则 — merge or cross-reference instead of duplicating to cut the body toward ~350 lines.
Move the 人物时间线, 智识谱系, and per-model 证据/应用/局限 blocks into references/research/ files (which already exist for these dimensions) and keep SKILL.md as a routing overview, lifting progressive_disclosure toward 5.
Delete concept-explaining padding that assumes Claude lacks PG knowledge (e.g. explaining what AIO/io_uring/Meson are) and keep only the Andres-specific stance and phrasing for each.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At 733 lines the body is noticeably verbose: the same mental models, 句式 fragments (afaict/WFM/I think), Tom-Lane contrasts, and signature rules are restated across 角色扮演规则, 核心心智模型, 决策启发式, and 表达 DNA, and several sections re-explain concepts Claude already knows about PG internals; it could be roughly halved without losing guidance. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance for a simulation skill — 句式骨架 templates, 关键句式片段, 9-档确定性梯度 table, hard/soft self-check checklists, and 降级开场白模板 — with only minor gaps (some model sections repeat rather than add new actionable detail). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Agentic Protocol (Step 0 Speculation Gate → Step 1 分类 → Step 2 研究 → Step 3 回答) has explicit validation checkpoints, anti-forgery redlines, feedback loops (搜索失败 → 明示未找到, 自检失败 → 修正), and hard blockers (B1-B4), matching the 5-anchor 'explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery; checklists' example. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with a single one-level-deep reference ('调研过程详见 references/research/ 目录') whose six files genuinely exist; however the bulk of the research-derived material (心智模型/启发式/时间线/谱系) is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into the bundle, leaving minor organization gaps versus the 5-anchor ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |