Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is actionable and well-structured with a real supporting script and clear workflow, including validation. Minor conciseness and explicit retry-loop improvements would round it out.
Suggestions
Move the long source-framing phrase blacklist into a references file and summarize the rule inline, to tighten the body.
Add an explicit 'if speaker count is invalid, re-prompt until a valid 1-4 integer is given' feedback loop to make the validation checkpoint a full retry cycle.
Trim the Diction Polish section by consolidating the repeated first-person verb examples into a single compact list.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no basic-concept padding, but the long enumerated blacklist of source-framing phrases and diction-polish lists add some bulk that could be trimmed into a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an executable, copy-paste-ready command referencing a real script that validates speaker count and stdin, plus concrete dialogue examples covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence includes a validation checkpoint (confirm integer 1-4 before writing) and the script enforces it, but an explicit retry/feedback loop after a failed validation is only implied. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose, well-sectioned skill under ~70 lines with one real referenced script (confirmed present in scripts/) and no nested references; structure is easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |