Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a clear, well-sequenced workflow with strong exception handling and concrete output specifications, and the actionability is high for an instruction-only skill. Its weaknesses are duplication of the workflow across the TL;DR decision tree and checkpoint table, and the absence of any bundle files despite ~245 lines whose template and SVG spec would fit naturally in reference files.
Suggestions
Move the full article structure template and the SVG four-quadrant matrix spec into a references/ file (e.g. references/output-template.md), keeping only a short summary inline, to improve progressive disclosure and cut SKILL.md length.
Remove the duplicated workflow restatement in the 决策树速查 and 检查点设计 sections — keep one (the checkpoint table) since the 异常处理 branches are already stated inline at Step 1 and Step 1.5.
Add one worked mini-example (a filled-in Bug analysis with a sample Mermaid 利益链条图 showing the actual node/edge syntax) to close the actionability gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly operational instructions rather than padding, but it can be tightened: the "核心理念" quote, parts of "注意事项" restating earlier rules, and the "决策树速查（TL;DR）" plus "检查点设计" table both re-state the Step 1–4 flow and the inline "⚠️ 异常处理" branches. Not 2 because nothing explains concepts Claude already knows; not 4 because the duplication is noticeable rather than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, largely copy-paste-ready guidance: exact search keyword strings, an SVG spec (viewBox "0 0 800 600", quadrant hex colors), an output path pattern with a pinyin example, and a complete article template. Not 5 because there is no worked example of a finished analysis and the required Mermaid 利益链条图 never specifies the diagram type or node/edge structure. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (Step 1 → 1.5 → 2 → 3 → 4) with explicit error-recovery loops ("扩大关键词…最多重试2轮", fallback to 1 bug plus a cross-industry analogy, 5-minute user-response timeout with a documented default) and a dedicated checkpoint table. Feedback loops and checkpoints are explicitly designed in, matching the anchor-5 example. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single ~245-line file with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle; well-sectioned, but content that belongs in reference files — the full article output template and the SVG matrix spec — is inlined in SKILL.md. Structure exists and navigation is easy (better than anchor 2), but the inlined template content keeps it below anchor 4's 'most content appropriately placed'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |