Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable multi-step workflow with strong sequencing and validation checkpoints, undermined slightly by redundancy between the steps and the TL;DR/checkpoint sections, and by a monolithic inline structure that could benefit from reference files.
Suggestions
Collapse or remove the 决策树速查 and 检查点设计 sections where they duplicate the numbered steps, keeping them only if they add genuinely new information.
Move the full article structure template and SVG quadrant spec into a reference file (e.g. references/template.md) and link to it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Replace open-ended placeholder analysis sections with one concrete worked example so the expected output depth is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly actionable and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the 决策树速查 TL;DR and 检查点设计 table restate content already covered in the numbered steps, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete search strings, an exact output path, exact SVG viewBox/colors, and a full copy-paste markdown template, but the analysis sections themselves rely on placeholders and open-ended generation leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Step 1→1.5→2→3→4 flow with explicit feedback loops (异常处理 keyword-expansion retries, user confirmation before deep analysis) and a 检查点设计 checklist for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is well-sectioned but ~245 lines are entirely inlined with no bundle files; the large article template and SVG spec are content that could live in separate reference files, and there are no one-level-deep references to signal. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |