Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and appropriately split across reference files, with a clear sequenced workflow and actionable output requirements. It would benefit from slightly tighter prose and more explicit validation feedback loops in the workflow steps.
Suggestions
Tighten the Goal section: remove the 'Do not write generic consulting slogans' restatement and keep only the constructive directive to reduce token overhead.
Add an explicit validation loop after step 1 (e.g., 'before proceeding, confirm each major claim is labeled fact/inference/assumption; if any changeable claim lacks a source, re-search or mark unverified').
In step 5, give the exact mkdir/save commands or a one-line shell snippet so the save step is copy-paste executable rather than descriptive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly directive and efficient, listing concrete workflow steps without padding, though a few sentences restate obvious consulting principles that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete guidance — specific filename pattern, directory creation, and a detailed output checklist — with only minor gaps; being instruction-only, the absence of executable code is acceptable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with implicit validation checkpoints (record fact/inference/assumption, mark unverified sections, search before asking up to 5 questions), though the feedback loops are not as explicit as a validate→fix→retry pattern. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview that points to three real one-level-deep reference files (enterprise-profile-framework.md, evidence-standards.md, report-template.md), each clearly signaled with 'read references/...'. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |