Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit validation/fallback handling, and concrete examples. The only minor weakness is a handful of philosophical asides that slightly pad the otherwise lean body.
Suggestions
Trim the philosophical commentary in the 目的 section ('提问的价值高于回答——一个好问题能框定一片值得探索的领域，激发思考与讨论') and the '核心张力' block to the essential calibration guidance, keeping only what directly shapes generation.
Consider collapsing the 反面清单 cross-references to standard numbers into a single compact table to reduce repetition of the '违反标准 X' pattern.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean — every section (七条标准, 工作流程, 输出格式, 反面清单, 样例) earns its place — but includes a few philosophical asides ('提问的价值高于回答——一个好问题能框定一片值得探索的领域' and the '核心张力' commentary block) that could be trimmed without loss. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides five concrete generative lenses, exact search-query templates ('<行业> 2026 热点 争议'), a seven-card scoring rubric for filtering, a copy-ready output format, and a fully worked 预制菜 example — fully actionable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–5 are clearly sequenced, with a mandatory validation checkpoint in Step 2 (forced web search with an explicit fallback path and labeling when the tool is unavailable) and a feedback loop in Step 4 ('找不到真实依据 → 淘汰或联网补证'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a self-contained single file with no external references needed; content is organized into clearly signaled sections (目的, 标准, 工作流程, 输出格式, 反面清单, 样例) making navigation easy, and nothing is inlined that belongs in a separate file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |