CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

higher-order-article-writer

Read a provided URL, local file, or pasted article, digest its core claims and assumptions, rebuild the topic into a concise original source-backed Chinese Markdown article, and save it under the current project's markdown directory. Use when the user asks to upgrade, elevate, rewrite, extend, deconstruct, critique, refine, or produce a higher-order article from an existing article or URL, especially when the desired output should preserve the source insight but feel like a clean standalone article rather than an analysis of the source.

70

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured instructional skill body with unusually concrete parameters, a clear gated workflow, and a complete output template. It would benefit from consolidating duplicated guidance and from an explicit failure/recovery path at the 逻辑三洽 checkpoint.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated 'do not expose source scaffolding / avoid 旧文 framing' guidance, which appears in both Workflow step 7 and Writing Requirements, into a single section.

Add an explicit recovery step after the 逻辑三洽 check (e.g., 'if any of the three checks fails, revise the thesis or assumptions and re-check before writing').

Consider moving the full output-structure template and audit-checklist detail into a reference file to keep SKILL.md a lean overview, and add one short worked example of a rebuilt article.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Efficient, instruction-only body that teaches genuinely non-obvious domain concepts (逻辑三洽, forbidden scaffolding phrases) without padding, but the 'do not expose the source as scaffolding' guidance is repeated across Workflow step 7 and Writing Requirements and could be consolidated.

4 / 5

Actionability

Mostly executable guidance with concrete parameters (3-7 core claims, 2-4 points, 900-1,600 Chinese characters, an explicit output structure template with a Mermaid example, enumerated forbidden phrases), though a worked example of a finished article is missing.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 7-step sequence with real checkpoints ("Do not start the new article until this extraction is coherent", the 逻辑三洽 check), but no explicit recovery loop telling Claude what to do when a checkpoint fails.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single-file skill with no bundle files, well-organized into Overview/Workflow/Output Structure/Writing Requirements; however, at ~110 lines, the output template and audit checklists could be split into reference files.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete and comprehensive on both capability and trigger terms, with an explicit 'Use when' clause. The only weakness is minor conflict risk from broadly applicable verbs like 'rewrite' and 'refine'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "Read a provided URL, local file, or pasted article", "digest its core claims and assumptions", "rebuild the topic into a concise original source-backed Chinese Markdown article", "save it under the current project's markdown directory" — covering inputs, transformation, output format, language, and destination comprehensively.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (read, digest, rebuild into a Chinese Markdown article, save under the markdown directory) and when ("Use when the user asks to upgrade, elevate, rewrite, ... from an existing article or URL") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural synonym coverage: "upgrade, elevate, rewrite, extend, deconstruct, critique, refine, or produce a higher-order article from an existing article or URL", matching phrases users would actually say when needing this skill.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (source-backed higher-order article rebuild) with mostly distinct triggers, but generic verbs like "rewrite" and "refine" create minor overlap risk with general writing/editing skills.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

digoal/blog

Path

skills/higher-order-article-writer/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.