CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

industry-chain-investment-analysis

Analyze an industry or sector from a senior investment-banking perspective for ordinary investors by mapping the industry chain, identifying representative listed companies at each node, and writing a source-backed Markdown report. Use when the user provides an industry/sector/产业 name and asks for 产业链分析, 行业上市公司梳理, 投资银行视角分析, 商业模式/上下游/核心竞争力/护城河/竞争格局/风险揭露, or a visual Markdown investment reference saved under the current project's markdown directory.

71

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, lean instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and good progressive disclosure to a real reference file. The main improvement room is making validation checkpoints explicit within the workflow rather than leaving them implicit.

Suggestions

Add an explicit verification checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., a step to confirm sources are primary and the saved Markdown renders with working source links before declaring the report complete).

Surface 1-2 of the report-framework's screening/analysis checklist items inline so the core action is executable without first opening the reference.

Tighten framing lines like 'Act as a senior investment banker: evidence-driven, structurally skeptical, and clear about uncertainty' into the Objective sentence to recover a few tokens.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — no padding about what an industry chain is — with tight bulleted steps; it falls just short of 'lean, every token earns its place' because a few framing phrases ('Act as a senior investment banker: evidence-driven, structurally skeptical...') could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill — 'Save under the current project's markdown/ directory', a concrete filename example, 'at least three useful visuals', 'State data cut-off date' — but the detailed company-screening/analysis checklist is delegated to the reference rather than fully specified inline, leaving minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear six-step sequence (clarify → gather → map → select → analyze → write) with an insufficient-evidence feedback loop ('say what is missing and write a narrower report instead of inventing coverage'); validation checkpoints are mostly implicit rather than explicit, so it sits at 'clear sequence with minor validation gaps' rather than the explicit-checkpoint 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a concise overview that clearly signals one-level-deep detail in a real bundle file — 'Read references/report-framework.md before writing the report. Use it for the report structure, company screening logic, analysis checklist, visuals, and risk language.' — matching the well-signaled one-level-deep reference anchor.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that states concrete capabilities and gives explicit bilingual trigger guidance for both what and when. The only minor gap is that the action list is slightly less comprehensive than the body's full analytical scope.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names three concrete actions — 'mapping the industry chain, identifying representative listed companies at each node, and writing a source-backed Markdown report' — but stops short of the fuller action set (business model, moat, risk analysis) covered in the body, so it fits 'several specific actions; minor gaps' rather than the comprehensive 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ('Analyze an industry... by mapping the industry chain, identifying representative listed companies... and writing a source-backed Markdown report') and when ('Use when the user provides an industry/sector/产业 name and asks for...'), with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-term coverage across both languages — 'industry/sector/产业 name', '产业链分析', '行业上市公司梳理', '投资银行视角分析', '商业模式/上下游/核心竞争力/护城河/竞争格局/风险揭露' — including synonyms and the file-output trigger, matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche — senior-IB-perspective industry-chain analysis producing a Markdown report — with highly specific bilingual triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the minimal-conflict-risk anchor.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
digoal/blog
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.