Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted instruction-only skill body: the coaching workflow is clearly sequenced with decision branches, and the guidance is unusually concrete (log template, phrasing examples, weakness-label taxonomy). The main improvement opportunities are trimming minor stylistic padding and moving the question-type catalog and log templates to a references file.
Suggestions
Trim stylistic padding passages (e.g. the closing sentences of §6 and repeated tone guidance in §4 and 注意事项) to reduce token cost without losing guidance.
Consider moving the eight-question-type catalog and the two markdown log-format templates to a references/ file (e.g. references/question-types.md and references/log-format.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with well-signaled pointers.
Consolidate the tone/coaching-philosophy guidance stated in both the 点评 section and 注意事项 into one place to remove redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, domain-specific coaching guidance Claude would not self-derive, but a few passages are stylistic padding (e.g. "把主动权和节奏感留给对话本身，而不是把训练做成打卡式的问答机器") and the tone guidance is repeated across the 点评 section and 注意事项. This fits anchor 4 (minor instances that could be trimmed) rather than anchor 3, since no section explains things Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: an exact log path (`markdown/logic-training-log.md`), a copy-paste-ready log template with field-by-field definitions, a defined weakness-label vocabulary ("忽略反例", "因果相关混淆") for aggregation, six concrete follow-up phrasings, and eight concrete question archetypes with examples. Specific examples cover the common cases, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The round flow (开场判断新/老用户 → 出题 → 追问 → 点评 → 记录 → 顺势推进) is clearly sequenced with explicit decision branches at each step: new vs. returning user, self-correction vs. stuck after 2-3 rounds, frustration fallback, and a recurring-weakness threshold (4-5 occurrences). This matches anchor 5's explicit checkpoints and error-recovery feedback loops, adapted to a conversational rather than destructive operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill with clear sections and no external references, but at ~105 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill case; the eight-question-type catalog and the two log-format templates are plausible candidates for a references/ file. Structure is good with minor organization gaps (anchor 4), not the perfectly split overview of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |