Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, highly actionable workflow with strong validation gates and a clean reference structure. Its main weakness is verbosity — rationale paragraphs and a redundant failure-mode catalog could be trimmed to improve token efficiency.
Suggestions
Trim the rationale paragraphs ("为什么必须落盘", "为什么要有具体人设") to one line each or move them into the relevant reference files; the rules already justify themselves.
Consolidate the 失败模式 section — most entries restate workflow rules; keep only the entries that add genuinely new failure modes not already covered inline.
Move the full report skeleton code blocks (factcheck, redteam) into the existing templates in assets/ and reference them by name, reducing the inlined bulk in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~336-line body is mostly efficient and does not explain basic concepts Claude already knows, but it carries noticeable padding in rationale blocks ("为什么必须落盘", "为什么要有具体人设") and a large failure-modes section that restates rules already embedded in the workflow. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact file-naming rules with kebab-case and date formats, fixed report structures in code blocks, per-item verification checklists, named tools (mcp__MiniMax__web_search, WebFetch), and concrete filename examples — fully executable guidance for the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven numbered steps include hard validation gates (3.7 self-verification, fact-check, red-team) with explicit feedback loops (re-validate until pass, max two rounds, fallback to "关键盲点") and a pre-output self-check checklist covering batch outputs. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview pointing to six real bundle files (all referenced paths resolve) listed in a 资源 section with one-line descriptions and step signals, one level deep; minor gap is that substantial report skeletons are inlined rather than living entirely in the templates. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |