Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable, well-gated workflow with real one-level-deep bundle files and thorough validation loops. The main costs are systematic rule repetition that inflates token usage and a stale '5 步' reference that contradicts the actual seven-step sequence.
Suggestions
Fix the stale step count: change '按以下 5 步严格执行' to 7 (or drop the count) so the sequence claim matches the actual steps.
State the file-naming convention once (in 步骤 3.8) and reference assets/expert-analysis-template.md from 步骤 7 instead of repeating it, eliminating the cross-file duplication and drift risk.
Collapse the 失败模式 section to only failure modes not already stated as rules in 步骤 5/6/7 (e.g. keep 虚假综合 and 概念膨胀, drop restatements of the hard gates), and trim the '为什么…' rationale paragraphs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is rule-dense with no filler explaining known concepts, but rules are systematically restated: file-naming conventions appear in full in both 步骤 3.8 and 步骤 7's 输出位置, and SURVIVES/WEAKENS/REFUTED handling rules appear in 步骤 6, the output self-check, and again in 失败模式. Fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'; not 2 since nothing is concept-padding, not 4 since the duplication is systematic rather than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready report templates for both gates, exact bilingual file-naming patterns with worked examples, named tools (mcp__MiniMax__web_search / WebFetch), a named subagent type, and a 12-item pre-output checklist. For an instruction-only skill this is fully executable guidance covering common cases, matching the level-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven numbered, hard-gated steps with feedback loops throughout (3.7 validate-fix-revalidate with three-round escalation, two-round fact-check loop, red-team verdict gates, final self-check). However the intro instructs '按以下 5 步严格执行, 不要跳步' while seven steps follow — a stale step count that muddles the sequence, keeping it at 'minor validation gaps' rather than level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All four references and two assets exist as real substantive files, are cited at point of use and indexed with descriptions in 资源, and are one level deep. But file-naming rules are duplicated between SKILL.md 步骤 3.8 and assets/expert-analysis-template.md (a drift hazard) and the body carries checklist/template material that could live in the bundle, fitting 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |