Conciseness

At ~798 lines the body assumes Claude's competence on the medical domain and mostly earns its tokens, but it carries verbatim duplication (e.g. 模型 5 场景 3/4 repeated at lines 419-421) and large reference-style blocks (timeline, 谱系) that could be tightened or offloaded.

Actionability

Highly actionable for an instruction skill: concrete CHECKPOINT triggers, three-round questioning scripts, exact acupoints, dose rules, and ready-to-use web-search query strings — minor gaps come from the duplicated sections and a few '具体处方缺' notes.

Workflow Clarity

The Agentic Protocol (Step 1 classify → Step 2 research with mandatory tool use → Step 3 answer) and seven CHECKPOINTS give an explicit sequenced workflow with validation gates, blocking conditions (三轮追问后四诊 < 3 不开方), and feedback loops (三问法则, re-research).

Progressive Disclosure

Six real one-level reference files exist under references/research/, but they are mentioned only once (line 751) and the main body — timeline, 谱系, 医案, 启发式 — is inlined monolithically rather than split and pointed to those files, so navigation is poor despite the bundle being present.

Specificity

Names multiple concrete capabilities — '5 个核心心智模型', '8 条决策启发式', '完整的"倪氏四拍"表达 DNA' — and the five-dimensional clinical-thinking framework, giving comprehensive coverage rather than vague abstractions.

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (倪海厦经方临床思维框架, 5 心智模型, 8 启发式) and 'when' (explicit 核心触发词 plus 不触发 anti-trigger guidance), with concrete trigger phrases throughout.

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-term coverage organized into 11 categories (视角类, 经方类, 经典类, 方法类, 证型类, 急症类, 剂量类, 自创术语类, 场景类, 隐式触发) plus an explicit 不触发 list — these are phrases users would actually say.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A highly specific niche (倪海厦经方临床思维) with distinctive triggers (倪师, 返魂汤, 坐牢脸, 红丝贯睛) and an explicit 不触发 list to avoid misfires — minimal conflict risk with other skills.