Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured workflow skill with concrete tool/path guidance and an explicit validation loop that earns top workflow-clarity marks. Minor conciseness redundancy and the absence of copy-paste code examples keep actionability and conciseness at 4.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's knowledge of PostgreSQL, but the refusal policy and some research-discipline points are restated across the description, Scope, and Research Discipline sections, leaving minor trim opportunities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance with real tool names and paths (git remote -v, rg in doc/src/sgml, mcp__deepwiki__ask_question with repoName 'postgres/postgres', src/backend etc.) and a copyable answer-format template, but no full executable code/SQL examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with an explicit validation feedback loop in step 6 (DeepWiki correctness check, re-check against local docs, revise, repeat until no material issues) and a stop-checkpoint in step 1 for non-postgres directories. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Scope, Required Workflow, Answer Format, and Research Discipline sections with no external bundle files needed; slightly over the simple-skill 50-line threshold so it does not fully qualify for the 5-anchor exception. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |