Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and an explicit pre-output validation checklist. It is mostly token-efficient and well-organized; the only gaps are a missing error-recovery loop and some inline content that could be externalized.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop to Step 4: if a checklist item fails, fix the script and re-run the check before saving, to push workflow_clarity to 5.
Tighten the example dialogue block (it currently spans ~8 lines) to a minimal representative excerpt, or move the long example into a references/ file to improve conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Consider extracting the detailed 对话写作原则 and 特殊情况处理 sections into a references/ file referenced one level deep from SKILL.md to reach the top progressive_disclosure anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient: tables, bullet lists, and specific numeric guidance (2–6 sentences per speaker, 5–8 core points) earn their place. The full multi-line example dialogue and some special-case prose could be trimmed slightly, so it sits just below the lean anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable for an instruction-only skill: a headcount→role table, exact line format `Speaker X（姓名）: [对话内容]`, a copy-paste-ready example dialogue, concrete writing rules, a self-check checklist, and an explicit output path pattern with example. Specific examples cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear five-step sequence (read input → design roles → write script → self-check → save) with an explicit validation checkpoint (the Step 4 checklist before output) and a directory-creation guard. No explicit error-recovery/feedback loop, so it stays at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; all content is inline in one well-sectioned file (功能定位, 执行流程 Steps 1–5, 特殊情况处理) with clear headers and no nested references. Good organization, though some detailed writing rules/special cases could be split out, keeping it off the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |