Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only skill with excellent progressive disclosure, a clear 5-step workflow, and concrete actionable field/interface-level guidance. The main drag is conciseness — the discursive rhetorical style and the recap-style self-check inflate the body without adding proportional guidance.
Suggestions
Tighten the discursive prose in Step 4 (e.g., the [待确认] business-rule vs. implementation-detail rule can be stated in 2-3 sentences instead of a paragraph of motivational framing) to lift conciseness without losing the nuance.
Either trim the '写作质量自检' section to only the items NOT already covered in Step 4, or move it fully into the template so the body doesn't re-state the same checks twice.
Add one short inline worked example of a complete interface contract (request params + response + error codes) so the guidance is copy-paste-ready rather than only described.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and substantive, but the discursive prose style ('这种专业感是假的', extended '因为…所以' framing, motivational asides) and the self-check section re-covering Step 4 material could be tightened; it leans noticeably above a lean token budget despite earning most of its length. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout — '请求参数表：参数名、类型、是否必填、默认值、约束规则', named error-code categories, file naming `[product-name-en]-tech-design.md`, output to `markdown/`, and Mermaid `graph TD` — but lacks an inline worked example of a complete filled-in module, which lives only in the referenced template. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow with an overview diagram and a terminal '写作质量自检' checklist, but validation is a single post-hoc recap rather than inter-step checkpoints, and there are no error-recovery feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview that pushes detail to two real one-level-deep bundle files signaled by name in prose ('详细判断标准见 references/precision-rules.md', '使用 references/module-template.md 中的模板展开'); the split is appropriate and navigation is easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |