Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, highly actionable operating manual for a genuinely multi-step analysis task, with a good verification step and a prescriptive report template. Its main weaknesses are the orphaned-and-duplicated role checklist (a progressive-disclosure miss) and the absence of recovery guidance when verification or evidence-gathering fails.
Suggestions
Reference references/role-checklist.md explicitly from the Seven Role Analyses section (e.g. "when filling each role file, use the checklist in references/role-checklist.md") and trim the inline per-role bullets to avoid duplicating the checklist's content.
Replace the placeholder '/path/to/product-multi-role-analysis/scripts/...' in the command with a relative invocation (e.g. 'python3 scripts/create_analysis_workspace.py "Product Name" --base markdown/product-analysis') so it is copy-paste ready.
Add a feedback loop after the verification step, e.g. 'If a strong conclusion lacks a supporting source, either find evidence for it, downgrade it to a labeled inference, or remove it before writing final-report.md.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with actionable instructions and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but it is not perfectly lean: the "Role-specific focus" bullets in the Seven Role Analyses section substantially duplicate the per-role checklists that already exist in references/role-checklist.md, so the same guidance is stated twice in the bundle. This fits the level-4 anchor (efficient with minor instances that could be trimmed) rather than level 5 where every token earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly concrete: a 9-step numbered workflow, exact paths (markdown/product-analysis/<product-slug>-<YYYYMMDD>/, roles/01-user.md ... 07-partner.md, sources/source-notes.md, final-report.md), a full bash command, an 11-section report template, and enumerated table columns. It falls just short of level 5 because the script invocation uses a placeholder path ("python3 /path/to/product-multi-role-analysis/scripts/create_analysis_workspace.py") that is not copy-paste ready, and steps like "Collect evidence from provided docs or links first. Browse current public sources" leave the search strategy to inference. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step sequence is clear, uses the workspace script to guarantee required files exist, and ends with an explicit verification step ("Verify that every strong conclusion is supported by at least one cited source or is clearly labeled as inference"). It does not reach level 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (what to do when verification fails, or when evidence is missing for a role) and the bundled role checklist is not wired into the workflow. The destructive/batch cap does not apply since the skill only creates new files. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle contains references/role-checklist.md and scripts/create_analysis_workspace.py; the script is well signaled with a code block and description, but references/role-checklist.md is never mentioned anywhere in SKILL.md, and its per-role checklists are inlined (nearly duplicated) in the Seven Role Analyses section instead. Per the guideline to score against the actual bundle structure, this matches the level-3 anchor: references present but not clearly signaled, and content that should live in the separate file is inline. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |