Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only skill body: lean, sequenced workflow with a validation checklist and clean one-level-deep reference and asset files. The main gaps are the absence of a retry/fix loop after the self-check and the lack of concrete example artifacts (search queries, question option sets, scoring tables).
Suggestions
Add a feedback loop to Step 7: state what to do when a checklist item fails (e.g. which step to revisit and re-run the check before writing the file).
Include one small concrete example — e.g. a sample 竞品对比 1-5 星 table row or a sample AskUserQuestion options block — so the common output cases are copy-paste ready.
Replace the personal absolute path example with a generic one (e.g. <project>/markdown/) to keep the guidance portable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive throughout: short bullet steps, 何时使用/何时不要使用 lists, concrete rules (SVG 字体、文件名、mkdir 命令), and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows (no "what is mermaid/markdown" padding). One slightly noisy detail — the personal absolute path example "/Users/digoal/new/markdown/" — is a concrete path template, not padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is largely executable: named tools ("AskUserQuestion", "mcp__MiniMax__web_search"), exact output paths and naming rules, "mkdir -p markdown/svg", an 8-section report structure, and a pre-output self-check checklist. Not level 5 because there are no concrete examples of the actual artifacts (e.g. a sample search query pair, a sample AskUserQuestion option set, or a scoring-table snippet) that would make the common cases copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with an explicit Step 7 自检 checklist (7 checkboxes) as a validation checkpoint before output, and skip-conditions in Step 1. It falls short of the level-5 anchor because the checklist has no feedback loop — there is no 'if a check fails, go back and fix X' recovery guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a well-organized overview; detailed material is split into one-level-deep, clearly signaled bundle files — "读 references/evaluation-framework.md" (load timing stated in the file header) and "参考 assets/report-skeleton.md" — both verified to exist, and each is listed again in a Resources section with a one-line description of when to use it. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |