Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill: an 8-step workflow with a genuine self-check loop, concrete templates and file conventions, and clean offloading of grade baselines and a worked example to real reference files. The only real weakness is redundancy — the rules appear in the workflow overview, the detailed sections, and again in the checklist.
Suggestions
Trim the triple restatement of the same rules: either drop the 8-step 工作流程 summary of steps 5–8 (keeping it to input/reading/grade-baseline steps) or slim the 质量自检清单 to only the checks not already enforced inline, since the workflow, detail sections, and checklist each repeat the same requirements.
Cut motivational rationale aimed at the reader rather than the task (e.g., "这是关键：只有说中他心里那个'想当然'，他才会被点醒" and "学生看不懂自己为什么会错，下次还会犯同样的错") — state the requirement itself; the imperative plus the four-step template already carries the instruction.
Merge the '第一步：确认输入' section into workflow step 1–2, since it only expands two bullets that the 工作流程 already lists, removing one of three passes over the same input-handling rules.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with skill-specific prescriptive content (grade language baselines, error-explanation format, image rules, file naming) and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, fitting the 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' anchor. However, the 8-step 工作流程 overview, the 第一步 section, and the 质量自检清单 each restate the same rules a second or third time, and rationale sentences like "只有说中他心里那个'想当然'，他才会被点醒" add persuasion Claude doesn't need — noticeable but not enough padding to drop to 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully concrete: a copy-paste-ready MCP call example with the exact prompt text, exact file paths and naming patterns (markdown/<英文短名>-讲解.md, svg/ vs markdown/svg/ path note), counts (3~5 题, 0~2 images), the ordered 解法-priority rule, and a four-step template for error explanations. Per the instruction-skill scoring note, this level of specific executable guidance earns the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step numbered workflow ends in a validation checkpoint — "自检 → 对照'质量自检清单'逐项核对后再交付" — with the checklist re-verifying computed answers, grade-baseline compliance, and file output. This matches the anchor with explicit validation steps and a checklist; level 4 would leave checkpoints implicit. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md stays a lean overview while grade-level language rules and a full worked example are pushed to real one-level-deep references (references/grade_levels.md, references/examples.md — both verified to exist and substantive), clearly signaled in the 资源 section with per-file purpose and read-when instructions. This is the clear-overview anchor; nothing is deeply nested or buried. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |