CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

student-tutor

给学生用其所在年级听得懂的语言通俗讲解题目,并生成举一反三练习。当用户给出年级 + 题目(文字或图片)希望得到讲解、辅导、"讲到孩子能听懂"、出同类练习题时使用。覆盖小学到高中的数学、物理、化学、语文、英语、生物等学科。输出为当前项目 markdown/ 目录下的两个 Markdown 文件:讲解文件与配套练习文件。

72

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured instructional skill with clear sequencing, validation checkpoints, and clean one-level reference splitting. The main weaknesses are mild overview/section redundancy and the highest-value易错点 section leaning on an external example rather than an inline concrete illustration.

Suggestions

Trim redundancy between the 8-step 工作流程 overview and the later expanded sections — keep the overview as a brief roadmap and let the dedicated sections carry the detail.

Add a short inline worked illustration of the four-step 易错点 format (错法→为什么这么想→为什么错→怎么避免) so the skill's most important guidance is concrete without requiring examples.md.

Note fallback behavior in the MCP image-reading step (what to do if the image cannot be parsed or returns empty) to strengthen the input-validation feedback loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what fractions or subjects are) and focuses on task-specific methodology, but the 8-step 工作流程 overview is re-expanded in later sections (第一步, 讲解结构, 易错点, 自检清单), creating mild redundancy that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Gives a copy-paste-ready MCP call with concrete prompt/params, explicit file-naming patterns, SVG path conventions, and a four-step 易错点 template — mostly executable, with the minor gap that the highest-value section relies on examples.md rather than an inline worked snippet.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear 8-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints: input confirmation (ask for grade if missing, echo image-derived question), and a交付前自检 checklist serving as a feedback gate before output — matching the checklist-for-complex-processes anchor.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Body is an overview that delegates detail to two real one-level-deep references (grade_levels.md for grade baselines, examples.md for a full worked example), each clearly signaled with a one-line purpose in the 资源 section; both files exist in ./references/.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-targeted description that clearly states capability, output format, and concrete trigger conditions using natural user language. The only minor gap is action breadth — two core actions rather than a comprehensive multi-action list.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names two core concrete actions ("通俗讲解题目", "生成举一反三练习") plus concrete output artifacts (讲解文件/练习文件 in markdown/), but stops short of the multi-action comprehensive list a 5 would require.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (grade-appropriate explanation + 举一反三 practice, output as two markdown files) and when ("当用户给出年级 + 题目...希望得到讲解、辅导...时使用") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a parent/teacher would actually say — "讲解", "辅导", "讲到孩子能听懂", "出同类练习题" — covering synonyms for both the explanation and practice-generation triggers.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (grade-locked student tutoring with practice generation) with distinct triggers (年级+题目, 讲到孩子能听懂, 举一反三) unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
digoal/blog
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.