Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill: a crisp six-step workflow, concrete defaults, and a complete report template with diagram examples. Its main improvement levers are splitting the report template/search-term catalog into a reference file and adding an explicit verify-then-fix loop for the saved report.
Suggestions
Move the full report structure template and the search-term lists into a references/report-template.md file, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with a one-level-deep pointer.
Add an explicit validation step after writing the report (e.g., re-check that every citation resolves and the Mermaid/SVG render, fix and re-verify if not) to create a true feedback loop.
Tighten the Overview's motivational phrasing ('The goal is not to moralize after the fact...') into a one-line purpose statement to save tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — no explanations of what news, incentives, or Mermaid are; every section (inputs, workflow, report structure, quality bar) carries operational content. Minor trimming is possible (e.g., the long bilingual search-term lists and the phrase 'The goal is not to moralize after the fact' narrative), keeping it just below the lean-and-tidy 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully concrete for an instruction-only skill: specific search terms in both languages, layered fix timeframes (0-7 days / 30-90 days / 6-24 months) with named measures, an exact output path convention 'markdown/<YYYYMMDD>-<scope-slug>-world-bug-opportunity.md', and a copy-paste-ready report template including a Mermaid flowchart, SVG skeleton, and solution table. This matches the anchor for copy-paste-ready, specific examples covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (define scope → search → select bug → analyze → design solutions → write/save) with some explicit checkpoints: 'If no candidate has enough evidence, report that the evidence is too weak instead of forcing a sensational conclusion', and the network-unavailable fallback. It falls short of 5 because there are no true validate-and-retry feedback loops (e.g., verifying the saved report renders or re-checking citations), though no destructive/batch cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Overview, Inputs And Defaults, Workflow, Report Structure, Quality Bar) with no nested references — a single self-contained file with easy navigation. It does not reach 5 because at ~135 lines the full report template and search-term catalog could arguably live in a reference file, leaving SKILL.md as a leaner overview; it stays above 3 since nothing is buried and structure is consistent. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |