Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exceptionally actionable — exact file names, search queries, SVG specs, and a complete PRD template — with a well-sequenced 4-step workflow, scenario handling, and a validation checklist. Its weaknesses are token efficiency (philosophical framing plus a checklist that duplicates template constraints) and the total absence of progressive disclosure: everything, including a 260-line template, is inlined in one 500-line file instead of being split into reference files.
Suggestions
Split the full PRD template (Step 4) and the special-scenario handling (场景 A–F) into files under references/ (e.g., references/prd-template.md, references/scenarios.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview that links to them — this directly addresses the lowest-scoring dimension, progressive_disclosure.
Trim the 写作质量核查清单 to only the checks not already enforced by the template structure (most MoSCoW/JTBD/table checks duplicate what the template mandates), cutting a large block of near-redundant tokens.
Drop the conceptual framing Claude already knows (the WHY→WHAT→HOW→MEASURE philosophy quote and the JTBD worked format), keeping only the instruction to apply the JTBD template when filling section 2.2.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 260-line PRD template and SVG specs are the actual deliverable and earn their tokens, but there is padding a competent model doesn't need: the philosophy framing ('PRD 是团队在不确定性中的共同契约'), a worked JTBD format explainer, and a 30-item 写作质量核查清单 that largely re-states constraints already embedded in the template. Mostly efficient with unnecessary explanation that could be tightened — the anchor-3 fit. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready throughout: ready-made search query templates ('[产品领域] market size 2024/2025'), exact file-naming conventions ('[product-name]-prd.md', '[product-name]-architecture.svg'), a precise SVG technical spec (viewBox, font-family, full hex color palette), and a complete fill-in PRD template with populated table structures. Nothing is left as vague direction. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence is presented with an ASCII flowchart, six special-scenario branches (A–F), an expected output file manifest, and a post-generation 写作质量核查清单 that functions as an explicit validation checkpoint. It falls short of the anchor-5 'feedback loops for error recovery' pattern only because there is no fix-and-recheck loop after checklist failures. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a monolithic ~500-line SKILL.md with no bundle files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist). The full PRD template (~260 lines) and the special-scenario guidance clearly belong in separate reference files that could be loaded on demand, matching the anchor-2 'content that clearly belongs in separate files is inlined'. It is not a 3 because that anchor requires references to be present, and there are none; internal sectioning is decent, keeping it above the worst case. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |