Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, well-validated workflow, but it is bulky and monolithic—large reference-grade material is inlined rather than split into progressively-disclosed bundle files.
Suggestions
Move the full PRD Markdown template (Step 4) and the SVG technical specification (Step 3) into separate reference files under references/ and link to them one level deep, leaving a concise overview in SKILL.md.
Condense the six special-scenario variants into a compact table or move them to a reference file to reduce inline bulk.
Trim the 'core philosophy' preamble and inline JTBD/MoSCoW explanations that assume Claude lacks general product-management knowledge.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but noticeably padded: the full PRD template, complete SVG specification, and six special-scenario variants are all inlined, making the body far longer than necessary for an overview. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable with concrete file-naming conventions, SVG viewBox/font/color specs, ready-to-use web-search query templates, a full PRD section structure with Given/When/Then acceptance criteria, and a writing-quality checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence is laid out with an ASCII flow diagram, explicit per-step deliverables, special-scenario branching, and a multi-layer checklist that acts as validation feedback before output. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the SKILL.md is monolithic; the full PRD template and SVG spec that clearly belong in separate reference files are inlined with no one-level-deep navigation to split content. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |